Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

¾Ç°ñ³¶Á¾ÀÇ ÀÓ»ó ¹æ»ç¼±ÇÐÀû ¿¬±¸

CLINICO-RADIOLOGICAL STUDY OF CYST OF THE JAW

Ä¡°ú¹æ»ç¼± 1983³â 13±Ç 1È£ p.163 ~ 168
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
¹ÚÅ¿ø/Tae Won Park

Abstract

ÀúÀÚ´Â °ú°Å 10³â°£ ¼­¿ï´ëÇб³º´¿ø Ä¡°úÁø·áºÎ¿¡ ³»¿øÇÏ¿© Ä¡¼º³¶Á¾ Áï Ä¡±Ù´Ü ³¶Á¾, ÇÔ
Ä¡¼º ³¶Á¾ »êÀ¯ ³¶Á¾, ¿ø±â¼º ³¶Á¾À¸·Î Áø´ÜÀ» ¹ÞÀº ȯÀÚ¸¦ ºÐ¼®ÇÏ¿´´ø ¹Ù, ÃÑ 243¸íÀ» ´ë»ó
À¸·Î ´ÙÀ½°ú °°Àº °á°ú¸¦ ¾ò¾ú´Ù.
1. ¼ºº° ºÐÆ÷´Â ³²ÀÚ°¡ 155·Ê (63.78%)·Î ¿©ÀÚº¸´Ù ¸¹¾ÒÀ¸¸ç, ¿¬·ÉºÐÆ÷´Â 201 (66·Ê,
27.2%), 30´ë (48·Ê, 19.8%)ÀÇ ¼øÀ̾ú°í, Æò±Õ¿¬·ÉÀº 33. 1¼¼¿´´Ù.
2. ¹ß»ý ºÎÀ§´Â »ó¾ÇÀÌ 147·Ê (60.5%)·Î ÇϾǺ¸´Ù ¸¹¾Ò´Ù.
3. ¹æ»ç¼±ÇÐÀû ¾ç»óÀº ´Ü¹æ¼º 236·Ê (97. 1%), °æ°è ¸íÈ®ÇÑ °Í 242·Ê (99.6%), ¸íÈ®ÇÑ °Í
222·Ê (91.7%)·Î ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù.
4. ÀÎÁ¢ÇÑ Ä¡¾ÆÂ÷ÀÇ °ü°è¿¡¼­ ¾Æ¹«·± º¯È­¸¦ ¾ß±âÇÏÁö ¾ÊÀº °ÍÀÌ 142·Ê (58.4%), Ä¡±ÙÈí¼ö
57·Ê (23.5%), Ä¡±ÙÀÌ°³ 52·Ê (21.4%)ÀÇ ¼øÀ̾ú´Ù.
5. ³¶Á¾ÀÌ ÇϾǿ¡ ¹ß»ýÇÑ °æ¿ì ³¶Á¾¿¡ ÀÇÇÏ¿© ÇÏÄ¡Á¶°ü º®¿¡ º¯È­¸¦ ¾ß±â½ÃŲ °æ¿ì°¡ 30
·Ê (31.2%) ¿´´Ù.
6. ³¶Á¾ÀÌ »ó¾Ç¿¡ ¹ß»ýÇÑ °æ¿ì »ó¾Çµ¿À» involveÇÑ °æ¿ì°¡ 61·Ê (41.5%)·Î °¡Àå ¸¹¾Ò´Ù
#ÃÊ·Ï#
The author analyzed 243 cases clinically and radiographically which were diagnosed as
odontogenic cyst in SNUH during 10 years (1974. 1 - 1983. 12).
The obtained results were as follows :
1. This cyst occurred more frequently in male than in female and the incidence was
the highest in the 3 rd decade.
2. Maxilla was more frequently affected than mandible
3. Most of the odontogenic cysts were unilocular type (236 cases, 97.1%), showing
distinct border (242 cases, 99.6%) with smooth margin (222 cases, 91.7%).
4. The adjacent teeth showed root resorption in 57 cases (23.5%), and root divergence
in 52cases (21.4%).
5. The cyst in lower jaw caused the displacement of the mandibular canal wall in 30
cases (31.25).
6. The cyst in upper jaw extended to the maxillary sinus in 61 cases (41.5%)

Å°¿öµå

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

  

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸